summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorZac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>2010-10-06 17:20:09 -0700
committerZac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>2010-10-06 17:20:09 -0700
commit94fc9aa76ba458798b7405f4ce8813a49046380e (patch)
treed1109b5763adb64e35741493b2733c904b17c72b
parentada0dbfd43d896dd09570261aa5c62a2cb0021c0 (diff)
downloadportage-94fc9aa76ba458798b7405f4ce8813a49046380e.tar.gz
portage-94fc9aa76ba458798b7405f4ce8813a49046380e.tar.bz2
portage-94fc9aa76ba458798b7405f4ce8813a49046380e.zip
Merge slot conflict backtracking from master.
This include the ability to mask packages that don't satisfy all parent atoms, from commit 9ff5e9731142d389373ea6ebc949919c3b637110.
-rw-r--r--pym/_emerge/depgraph.py97
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 36 deletions
diff --git a/pym/_emerge/depgraph.py b/pym/_emerge/depgraph.py
index b086fe824..4095bbbba 100644
--- a/pym/_emerge/depgraph.py
+++ b/pym/_emerge/depgraph.py
@@ -891,47 +891,71 @@ class depgraph(object):
self._add_parent_atom(pkg, parent_atom)
self._process_slot_conflicts()
+ backtrack_data = []
+ fallback_data = []
all_parents = set()
- for node in (existing_node, pkg):
+ # The ordering of backtrack_data can make
+ # a difference here, because both mask actions may lead
+ # to valid, but different, solutions and the one with
+ # 'existing_node' masked is usually the better one. Because
+ # of that, we choose an order such that
+ # the backtracker will first explore the choice with
+ # existing_node masked. The backtracker reverses the
+ # order, so the order it uses is the reverse of the
+ # order shown here. See bug #339606.
+ for to_be_selected, to_be_masked in (existing_node, pkg), (pkg, existing_node):
+ # For missed update messages, find out which
+ # atoms matched to_be_selected that did not
+ # match to_be_masked.
parent_atoms = \
- self._dynamic_config._parent_atoms.get(node, set())
+ self._dynamic_config._parent_atoms.get(to_be_selected, set())
if parent_atoms:
conflict_atoms = self._dynamic_config._slot_conflict_parent_atoms.intersection(parent_atoms)
if conflict_atoms:
parent_atoms = conflict_atoms
+
all_parents.update(parent_atoms)
- # NOTE: Generally, we mask the higher version since
- # this solves common cases in which a lower version
- # is needed so that all dependencies will be
- # satisfied (bug #337178). However, if existing_node
- # happens to be installed then we mask that since
- # this is a common case that is triggered when
- # --update is not enabled.
- if existing_node.installed:
- to_be_masked = existing_node
- to_be_selected = pkg
- elif pkg > existing_node:
- to_be_masked = pkg
- to_be_selected = existing_node
- else:
- to_be_masked = existing_node
- to_be_selected = pkg
-
- # For missed update messages, find out which
- # atoms matched to_be_selected that did not
- # match to_be_masked.
- parent_atoms = \
- self._dynamic_config._parent_atoms.get(to_be_selected, set())
- if parent_atoms:
- conflict_atoms = self._dynamic_config._slot_conflict_parent_atoms.intersection(parent_atoms)
- if conflict_atoms:
- parent_atoms = conflict_atoms
-
- if to_be_selected >= to_be_masked:
- # We only care about the parent atoms
- # when they trigger a downgrade.
- parent_atoms = set()
+ all_match = True
+ for parent, atom in parent_atoms:
+ i = InternalPackageSet(initial_atoms=(atom,))
+ if not i.findAtomForPackage(to_be_masked):
+ all_match = False
+ break
+
+ if to_be_selected >= to_be_masked:
+ # We only care about the parent atoms
+ # when they trigger a downgrade.
+ parent_atoms = set()
+
+ fallback_data.append((to_be_masked, parent_atoms))
+
+ if all_match:
+ # 'to_be_masked' does not violate any parent atom, which means
+ # there is no point in masking it.
+ pass
+ else:
+ backtrack_data.append((to_be_masked, parent_atoms))
+
+ if not backtrack_data:
+ # This shouldn't happen, but fall back to the old
+ # behavior if this gets triggered somehow.
+ backtrack_data = fallback_data
+
+ if len(backtrack_data) > 1:
+ # NOTE: Generally, we prefer to mask the higher
+ # version since this solves common cases in which a
+ # lower version is needed so that all dependencies
+ # will be satisfied (bug #337178). However, if
+ # existing_node happens to be installed then we
+ # mask that since this is a common case that is
+ # triggered when --update is not enabled.
+ if existing_node.installed:
+ pass
+ elif pkg > existing_node:
+ backtrack_data.reverse()
+
+ to_be_masked, parent_atoms = backtrack_data[-1]
self._dynamic_config._runtime_pkg_mask.setdefault(
to_be_masked, {})["slot conflict"] = parent_atoms
@@ -941,13 +965,14 @@ class depgraph(object):
msg.append("")
msg.append("")
msg.append("backtracking due to slot conflict:")
+ if backtrack_data is fallback_data:
+ msg.append("!!! backtrack_data fallback")
msg.append(" first package: %s" % existing_node)
msg.append(" second package: %s" % pkg)
msg.append(" package to mask: %s" % to_be_masked)
msg.append(" slot: %s" % pkg.slot_atom)
- msg.append(" parents: %s" % \
- [(str(parent), atom) \
- for parent, atom in all_parents])
+ msg.append(" parents: %s" % ", ".join( \
+ "(%s, '%s')" % (ppkg, atom) for ppkg, atom in all_parents))
msg.append("")
writemsg_level("".join("%s\n" % l for l in msg),
noiselevel=-1, level=logging.DEBUG)