summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/bin/emerge
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'bin/emerge')
-rwxr-xr-xbin/emerge98
1 files changed, 81 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/bin/emerge b/bin/emerge
index 471552f17..ce0163c05 100755
--- a/bin/emerge
+++ b/bin/emerge
@@ -686,6 +686,9 @@ class depgraph:
"--getbinpkgonly" in self.myopts)
self.args_keys = []
self.global_updates = {}
+ self.pkg_node_map = {}
+ self.blocker_digraph = digraph()
+ self.blocker_parents = {}
def create(self, mybigkey, myparent=None, addme=1, myuse=None,
priority=digraph.HARD, rev_dep=False, arg=None):
@@ -700,15 +703,16 @@ class depgraph:
#IUSE-aware emerge -> USE DEP aware depgraph
#"no downgrade" emerge
"""
-
jbigkey = " ".join(mybigkey) + " merge"
if self.digraph.hasnode(jbigkey):
if addme and jbigkey != myparent:
# Refuse to make a node depend on itself so that the we don't
# don't create a bogus circular dependency in self.altlist().
if rev_dep and myparent:
+ self.pkg_node_map[myparent.split()[2]] = myparent
self.digraph.addnode(myparent, jbigkey, priority=priority)
else:
+ self.pkg_node_map[mybigkey[2]] = jbigkey
self.digraph.addnode(jbigkey, myparent, priority=priority)
return 1
jbigkey = " ".join(mybigkey) + " nomerge"
@@ -717,8 +721,10 @@ class depgraph:
requested as a command line argument. This can be solved by
checking all args prior to marking packages as nomerge"""
if rev_dep and myparent:
+ self.pkg_node_map[myparent.split()[2]] = myparent
self.digraph.addnode(myparent, jbigkey, priority=priority)
else:
+ self.pkg_node_map[mybigkey[2]] = jbigkey
self.digraph.addnode(jbigkey, myparent, priority=priority)
return 1
@@ -792,11 +798,14 @@ class depgraph:
""" At this point, we have either hit a blocker and returned, found the package in the
depgraph already and returned, or we are here. Whether we are merging or not; we must
add the package to the depgraph; so we do that here. """
+ jbigkey = " ".join(mybigkey)
if rev_dep and myparent:
- self.digraph.addnode(myparent, " ".join(mybigkey),
+ self.pkg_node_map[myparent.split()[2]] = myparent
+ self.digraph.addnode(myparent, jbigkey,
priority=priority)
else:
- self.digraph.addnode(" ".join(mybigkey), myparent,
+ self.pkg_node_map[mybigkey[2]] = jbigkey
+ self.digraph.addnode(jbigkey, myparent,
priority=priority)
""" This section determines whether we go deeper into dependencies or not.
@@ -1119,12 +1128,10 @@ class depgraph:
selected_pkg = None
if x[0]=="!":
# if this package is myself, don't append it to block list.
- if "--debug" in self.myopts:
- print "Myparent",myparent
- if (myparent):
- if myparent.split()[2] in \
- portdb.xmatch("match-all", x[1:]):
- # myself, so exit.
+ if myparent:
+ mydep = x[1:]
+ if mydep == portage.dep_getkey(mydep) and \
+ mydep == portage.dep_getkey(myparent.split()[2]):
continue
# adding block
selected_pkg = ["blocks", myroot, x[1:], None]
@@ -1319,10 +1326,9 @@ class depgraph:
def validate_blockers(self):
"""Remove any blockers from the digraph that do not match any of the
- packages within the graph. Blockers are only matched against the
- final state of the graph. Thus, it's possible that mutually blocking
- packages will be installed simultaneously a some point(s) during the
- transition from the initial to the final state."""
+ packages within the graph. If necessary, create hard deps to ensure
+ correct merge order such that mutually blocking packages are never
+ installed simultaneously."""
""" It's possible that some of the nodes haven't been added to the
fakedb yet, so make sure they're all accounted for."""
@@ -1330,6 +1336,8 @@ class depgraph:
node_split = node.split()
mytype, myroot, mykey = node_split[0:3]
if mytype in self.pkg_tree_map:
+ if node_split[3] == "nomerge":
+ continue
mydb = self.trees[myroot][self.pkg_tree_map[mytype]].dbapi
myslot = mydb.aux_get(mykey, ["SLOT"])[0]
self.mydbapi[myroot].cpv_inject(mykey, myslot=myslot)
@@ -1338,15 +1346,49 @@ class depgraph:
if node.split()[0] == "blocks"]
for blocker in all_blockers:
mytype, myroot, mydep = blocker.split()
- """Prior to being added to the digraph, any blockers against
- old-style virtuals have been expanded to real packages via
- dep_virtual calls inside dep_check."""
+ """ In case this block is unresolvable, save the parents for
+ later output in self.display()."""
+ self.blocker_parents[blocker] = self.digraph.parent_nodes(blocker)
if not self.mydbapi[myroot].match(mydep):
+ vardb = self.trees[myroot]["vartree"].dbapi
+ blocked_pkgs = vardb.match(mydep)
+ if not blocked_pkgs:
+ self.digraph.remove(blocker)
+ continue
+ """It may be possible to circumvent this block via correct
+ ordering of upgrades. If necessary, create hard deps to
+ enforce correct merge order."""
+ fakedb = self.mydbapi[myroot]
+ new_pkgs = []
+ for cpv in blocked_pkgs:
+ myslot = vardb.aux_get(cpv, ["SLOT"])[0]
+ myslot_atom = "%s:%s" % (portage.dep_getkey(cpv), myslot)
+ new_pkgs.append(
+ (myslot_atom, fakedb.match(myslot_atom)[0]))
+ for parent in self.digraph.parent_nodes(blocker):
+ ptype, proot, pcpv, pstatus = parent.split()
+ pdbapi = self.trees[proot][self.pkg_tree_map[ptype]].dbapi
+ pslot = pdbapi.aux_get(pcpv, ["SLOT"])[0]
+ pslot_atom = "%s:%s" % (portage.dep_getkey(pcpv), pslot)
+ for myslot_atom, pkg in new_pkgs:
+ if pslot_atom == myslot_atom:
+ """A merge within a slot invalidates the block,
+ so the order does not need to be enforced."""
+ continue
+ # Enforce correct merge order with a hard dep.
+ node = self.pkg_node_map[pkg]
+ self.digraph.addnode(node, parent)
+ """Count references to this blocker so that it can be
+ invalidated after nodes referencing it have been merged."""
+ self.blocker_digraph.addnode(node, blocker)
self.digraph.remove(blocker)
def altlist(self, reversed=False):
mygraph=self.digraph.copy()
+ myblockers = self.blocker_digraph.copy()
retlist=[]
+ circular_blocks = False
+ blocker_deps = None
if reversed:
get_nodes = mygraph.root_nodes
else:
@@ -1387,6 +1429,19 @@ class depgraph:
selected_nodes = None
if not selected_nodes:
+ if not myblockers.is_empty():
+ """A blocker couldn't be circumnavigated while keeping all
+ dependencies satisfied. The user will have to resolve this
+ manually. This is a panic condition and thus the order
+ doesn't really matter, so just pop a random node in order
+ to avoid a circular dependency panic if possible."""
+ if not circular_blocks:
+ circular_blocks = True
+ blocker_deps = myblockers.leaf_nodes()
+ if blocker_deps:
+ selected_nodes = [blocker_deps.pop()]
+
+ if not selected_nodes:
print "!!! Error: circular dependencies:"
print
mygraph.debug_print()
@@ -1395,6 +1450,15 @@ class depgraph:
for node in selected_nodes:
retlist.append(node.split())
mygraph.remove(node)
+ if not circular_blocks and myblockers.contains(node):
+ """This node may have invalidated one or more blockers."""
+ myblockers.remove(node)
+ for blocker in myblockers.root_nodes():
+ if not myblockers.child_nodes(blocker):
+ myblockers.remove(blocker)
+
+ if not myblockers.is_empty():
+ retlist.extend([node.split() for node in myblockers.root_nodes()])
return retlist
@@ -1631,7 +1695,7 @@ class depgraph:
addl=""+red("B")+" "+fetch+" "
resolved = self.trees[x[1]]["vartree"].resolve_key(x[2])
print "["+x[0]+" "+addl+"]",red(resolved),
- block_parents = self.digraph.parent_nodes(" ".join(x))
+ block_parents = self.blocker_parents[" ".join(x)]
block_parents = [pnode.split()[2] for pnode in block_parents]
block_parents = ", ".join(block_parents)
if resolved!=x[2]: