summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/service-model
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/service-model')
-rw-r--r--doc/service-model26
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/doc/service-model b/doc/service-model
deleted file mode 100644
index 26d628cb3..000000000
--- a/doc/service-model
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-One of the more grungy and fragile portions of the bcfg1 configuration
-description interface is that of bundle allocation. To wit, tags are
-used for two purposes in this same process. The first use is for
-initial choice of the software complement for any particular node. The
-second use is for specialization of particular nodes. The use of a tag
-for either purpose isn't particularly discernible from the other,
-moreover, tags can be used for multiple purposes simultaneously.
-
-<service name='internal-dns' type='dns' scope='local'>
- <producer host='antares' port='53' type='udp/ip'
- bundle='dhcp-server'/>
- <consumer tag='dhcp-config'/>
-</service>
-
-There is a whole lot going on here, so i will highlight the
-particulars i think are important.
-1. There is explicit linkage between a service and the software that
- provides it.
-2. there is an explicit scope to describe "how far" the service goes
-3. there is a notion of what network transport is required.
-4. you can construct monitoring/firewalling rules from this
-5. you can infer failure cascades from the relationship
-6. tags are used in choosing configurations as a specialization
- mechanism, no just through bundles.
-
-How do we extend the idea of coherence from bcfg1? \ No newline at end of file