From 4bf1c82868357e5c357e0b656419af37a99a8545 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Fenn Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:01:12 -0400 Subject: Get profile by building metadata instead of guessing Rather than doing some ad-hoc lookups of internal data structures stpierre suggested that it'd be better to use the normal metadata build procedures. This implements that and adjusts the tests. --- testsuite/Testsrc/Testlib/TestServer/TestPlugins/TestMetadata.py | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'testsuite/Testsrc/Testlib/TestServer') diff --git a/testsuite/Testsrc/Testlib/TestServer/TestPlugins/TestMetadata.py b/testsuite/Testsrc/Testlib/TestServer/TestPlugins/TestMetadata.py index 1273f0d30..32c893548 100644 --- a/testsuite/Testsrc/Testlib/TestServer/TestPlugins/TestMetadata.py +++ b/testsuite/Testsrc/Testlib/TestServer/TestPlugins/TestMetadata.py @@ -885,6 +885,9 @@ class TestMetadata(_TestMetadata, TestClientRunHooks, TestDatabaseBacked): metadata = self.load_clients_data(metadata=self.load_groups_data()) if not metadata._use_db: metadata.clients_xml.write = Mock() + metadata.core.build_metadata = Mock() + metadata.core.build_metadata.side_effect = \ + lambda c: metadata.get_initial_metadata(c) metadata.set_profile("client1", "group2", None) mock_update_client.assert_called_with("client1", -- cgit v1.2.3-1-g7c22