Revert r15161 so 12.2.5 is greater than 12.2b once again. Depending on how you

look at, it may seem counter-intuitive. However, if you really think about it,
it seems like it's probably safe to assume that 12.2.5 > 12.2b is the behavior
that is intended by anyone who would use versions such as these.

svn path=/main/trunk/; revision=15166

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/pym/portage/tests/versions/test_vercmp.py b/pym/portage/tests/versions/test_vercmp.py
index 9de3344ce..eb2ba3eb0 100644
--- a/pym/portage/tests/versions/test_vercmp.py
+++ b/pym/portage/tests/versions/test_vercmp.py
@@ -18,11 +18,11 @@ class VerCmpTestCase(TestCase):
 			("cvs.9999", "9999"),
 			("999999999999999999999999999999", "999999999999999999999999999998"),
 			("1.0.0", "1.0"),
-			("1.0b", "1.0.0"),
+			("1.0.0", "1.0b"),
 			("1b", "1"),
 			("1b_p1", "1_p1"),
 			("1.1b", "1.1"),
-			("12.2b", "12.2.5"),
+			("12.2.5", "12.2b"),
 		]
 		for test in tests:
 			self.failIf( vercmp( test[0], test[1] ) <= 0, msg="%s < %s? Wrong!" % (test[0],test[1]) )
@@ -41,11 +41,11 @@ class VerCmpTestCase(TestCase):
 			("1.0-r0", "1.0-r1"),
 			("1.0", "1.0-r1"),
 			("1.0", "1.0.0"),
-			("1.0.0", "1.0b"),
+			("1.0b", "1.0.0"),
 			("1_p1", "1b_p1"),
 			("1", "1b"),
 			("1.1", "1.1b"),
-			("12.2.5", "12.2b"),
+			("12.2b", "12.2.5"),
 		]
 		for test in tests:
 			self.failIf( vercmp( test[0], test[1]) >= 0, msg="%s > %s? Wrong!" % (test[0],test[1]))