1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
|
// Copyright (c) 2016 Mattermost, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
// See License.txt for license information.
package app
import (
"testing"
"github.com/mattermost/platform/model"
)
func TestSendNotifications(t *testing.T) {
th := Setup().InitBasic()
AddUserToChannel(th.BasicUser2, th.BasicChannel)
post1, postErr := CreatePost(&model.Post{
UserId: th.BasicUser.Id,
ChannelId: th.BasicChannel.Id,
Message: "@" + th.BasicUser2.Username,
}, th.BasicTeam.Id, true)
if postErr != nil {
t.Fatal(postErr)
}
mentions, err := SendNotifications(post1, th.BasicTeam, th.BasicChannel, th.BasicUser)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
} else if mentions == nil {
t.Log(mentions)
t.Fatal("user should have been mentioned")
} else if mentions[0] != th.BasicUser2.Id {
t.Log(mentions)
t.Fatal("user should have been mentioned")
}
}
func TestGetExplicitMentions(t *testing.T) {
id1 := model.NewId()
id2 := model.NewId()
// not mentioning anybody
message := "this is a message"
keywords := map[string][]string{}
if mentions, potential, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 0 || len(potential) != 0 {
t.Fatal("shouldn't have mentioned anybody or have any potencial mentions")
}
// mentioning a user that doesn't exist
message = "this is a message for @user"
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 0 {
t.Fatal("shouldn't have mentioned user that doesn't exist")
}
// mentioning one person
keywords = map[string][]string{"@user": {id1}}
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned @user")
}
// mentioning one person without an @mention
message = "this is a message for @user"
keywords = map[string][]string{"this": {id1}}
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned this")
}
// mentioning multiple people with one word
message = "this is a message for @user"
keywords = map[string][]string{"@user": {id1, id2}}
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 2 || !mentions[id1] || !mentions[id2] {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned two users with @user")
}
// mentioning only one of multiple people
keywords = map[string][]string{"@user": {id1}, "@mention": {id2}}
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] || mentions[id2] {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned @user and not @mention")
}
// mentioning multiple people with multiple words
message = "this is an @mention for @user"
keywords = map[string][]string{"@user": {id1}, "@mention": {id2}}
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 2 || !mentions[id1] || !mentions[id2] {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned two users with @user and @mention")
}
// mentioning @channel (not a special case, but it's good to double check)
message = "this is an message for @channel"
keywords = map[string][]string{"@channel": {id1, id2}}
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 2 || !mentions[id1] || !mentions[id2] {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned two users with @channel")
}
// mentioning @all (not a special case, but it's good to double check)
message = "this is an message for @all"
keywords = map[string][]string{"@all": {id1, id2}}
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 2 || !mentions[id1] || !mentions[id2] {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned two users with @all")
}
// mentioning user.period without mentioning user (PLT-3222)
message = "user.period doesn't complicate things at all by including periods in their username"
keywords = map[string][]string{"user.period": {id1}, "user": {id2}}
if mentions, _, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] || mentions[id2] {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned user.period and not user")
}
// mentioning a potential out of channel user
message = "this is an message for @potential and @user"
keywords = map[string][]string{"@user": {id1}}
if mentions, potential, _, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, keywords); len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id1] || len(potential) != 1 {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned user and have a potential not in channel")
}
}
func TestGetExplicitMentionsAtHere(t *testing.T) {
// test all the boundary cases that we know can break up terms (and those that we know won't)
cases := map[string]bool{
"": false,
"here": false,
"@here": true,
" @here ": true,
"\t@here\t": true,
"\n@here\n": true,
// "!@here!": true,
// "@@here@": true,
// "#@here#": true,
// "$@here$": true,
// "%@here%": true,
// "^@here^": true,
// "&@here&": true,
// "*@here*": true,
"(@here(": true,
")@here)": true,
// "-@here-": true,
// "_@here_": true,
// "=@here=": true,
"+@here+": true,
"[@here[": true,
"{@here{": true,
"]@here]": true,
"}@here}": true,
"\\@here\\": true,
// "|@here|": true,
";@here;": true,
":@here:": true,
// "'@here'": true,
// "\"@here\"": true,
",@here,": true,
"<@here<": true,
".@here.": true,
">@here>": true,
"/@here/": true,
"?@here?": true,
// "`@here`": true,
// "~@here~": true,
}
for message, shouldMention := range cases {
if _, _, hereMentioned, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions(message, nil); hereMentioned && !shouldMention {
t.Fatalf("shouldn't have mentioned @here with \"%v\"", message)
} else if !hereMentioned && shouldMention {
t.Fatalf("should've have mentioned @here with \"%v\"", message)
}
}
// mentioning @here and someone
id := model.NewId()
if mentions, potential, hereMentioned, _, _ := GetExplicitMentions("@here @user @potential", map[string][]string{"@user": {id}}); !hereMentioned {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned @here with \"@here @user\"")
} else if len(mentions) != 1 || !mentions[id] {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned @user with \"@here @user\"")
} else if len(potential) > 1 {
t.Fatal("should've potential mentions for @potential")
}
}
func TestGetMentionKeywords(t *testing.T) {
Setup()
// user with username or custom mentions enabled
user1 := &model.User{
Id: model.NewId(),
FirstName: "First",
Username: "User",
NotifyProps: map[string]string{
"mention_keys": "User,@User,MENTION",
},
}
profiles := map[string]*model.User{user1.Id: user1}
mentions := GetMentionKeywordsInChannel(profiles)
if len(mentions) != 3 {
t.Fatal("should've returned three mention keywords")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["user"]; !ok || ids[0] != user1.Id {
t.Fatal("should've returned mention key of user")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["@user"]; !ok || ids[0] != user1.Id {
t.Fatal("should've returned mention key of @user")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["mention"]; !ok || ids[0] != user1.Id {
t.Fatal("should've returned mention key of mention")
}
// user with first name mention enabled
user2 := &model.User{
Id: model.NewId(),
FirstName: "First",
Username: "User",
NotifyProps: map[string]string{
"first_name": "true",
},
}
profiles = map[string]*model.User{user2.Id: user2}
mentions = GetMentionKeywordsInChannel(profiles)
if len(mentions) != 2 {
t.Fatal("should've returned two mention keyword")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["First"]; !ok || ids[0] != user2.Id {
t.Fatal("should've returned mention key of First")
}
// user with @channel/@all mentions enabled
user3 := &model.User{
Id: model.NewId(),
FirstName: "First",
Username: "User",
NotifyProps: map[string]string{
"channel": "true",
},
}
profiles = map[string]*model.User{user3.Id: user3}
mentions = GetMentionKeywordsInChannel(profiles)
if len(mentions) != 3 {
t.Fatal("should've returned three mention keywords")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["@channel"]; !ok || ids[0] != user3.Id {
t.Fatal("should've returned mention key of @channel")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["@all"]; !ok || ids[0] != user3.Id {
t.Fatal("should've returned mention key of @all")
}
// user with all types of mentions enabled
user4 := &model.User{
Id: model.NewId(),
FirstName: "First",
Username: "User",
NotifyProps: map[string]string{
"mention_keys": "User,@User,MENTION",
"first_name": "true",
"channel": "true",
},
}
profiles = map[string]*model.User{user4.Id: user4}
mentions = GetMentionKeywordsInChannel(profiles)
if len(mentions) != 6 {
t.Fatal("should've returned six mention keywords")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["user"]; !ok || ids[0] != user4.Id {
t.Fatal("should've returned mention key of user")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["@user"]; !ok || ids[0] != user4.Id {
t.Fatal("should've returned mention key of @user")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["mention"]; !ok || ids[0] != user4.Id {
t.Fatal("should've returned mention key of mention")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["First"]; !ok || ids[0] != user4.Id {
t.Fatal("should've returned mention key of First")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["@channel"]; !ok || ids[0] != user4.Id {
t.Fatal("should've returned mention key of @channel")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["@all"]; !ok || ids[0] != user4.Id {
t.Fatal("should've returned mention key of @all")
}
dup_count := func(list []string) map[string]int {
duplicate_frequency := make(map[string]int)
for _, item := range list {
// check if the item/element exist in the duplicate_frequency map
_, exist := duplicate_frequency[item]
if exist {
duplicate_frequency[item] += 1 // increase counter by 1 if already in the map
} else {
duplicate_frequency[item] = 1 // else start counting from 1
}
}
return duplicate_frequency
}
// multiple users
profiles = map[string]*model.User{
user1.Id: user1,
user2.Id: user2,
user3.Id: user3,
user4.Id: user4,
}
mentions = GetMentionKeywordsInChannel(profiles)
if len(mentions) != 6 {
t.Fatal("should've returned six mention keywords")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["user"]; !ok || len(ids) != 2 || (ids[0] != user1.Id && ids[1] != user1.Id) || (ids[0] != user4.Id && ids[1] != user4.Id) {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned user1 and user4 with user")
} else if ids := dup_count(mentions["@user"]); len(ids) != 4 || (ids[user1.Id] != 2) || (ids[user4.Id] != 2) {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned user1 and user4 with @user")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["mention"]; !ok || len(ids) != 2 || (ids[0] != user1.Id && ids[1] != user1.Id) || (ids[0] != user4.Id && ids[1] != user4.Id) {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned user1 and user4 with mention")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["First"]; !ok || len(ids) != 2 || (ids[0] != user2.Id && ids[1] != user2.Id) || (ids[0] != user4.Id && ids[1] != user4.Id) {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned user2 and user4 with mention")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["@channel"]; !ok || len(ids) != 2 || (ids[0] != user3.Id && ids[1] != user3.Id) || (ids[0] != user4.Id && ids[1] != user4.Id) {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned user3 and user4 with @channel")
} else if ids, ok := mentions["@all"]; !ok || len(ids) != 2 || (ids[0] != user3.Id && ids[1] != user3.Id) || (ids[0] != user4.Id && ids[1] != user4.Id) {
t.Fatal("should've mentioned user3 and user4 with @all")
}
}
|
